Food hygiene in Gloucester City: results and inspection dates
- Food hygiene map
- England
- Food hygiene in Gloucester City: results and inspection dates
This is an area summary. It does not give a rating for one premises. Find a premises rating at the Food Standards Agency.
In Gloucester City, the hygiene file accepted on 18 October 2026 holds 1,031 known ratings, and 1.5% of them need improvement. The 95 percent interval runs from 0.8% to 2.4%. Against the same business types in England the gap is −1.6 pp. Waiting and exempt records stay outside.
Wilson 1.5% (95% interval 0.8% to 2.4%), from 1,031 ratings
This is an area summary, not a rating for one premises. Improvement means a result that needs improvement; it is not improvement over time. The file date is not the date of every inspection. Find a premises rating at the Food Standards Agency.
Needs improvement means FHRS ratings at 0, 1 or 2, or an FHIS Improvement Required result. Waiting and exempt results do not enter that share.
Median age of the known rating dates: 362 days. Older than two years: 14.1% (95% interval 12.0% to 16.4%), from 1,031 ratings.
- Gloucester City restaurants: 0.0% (95% interval 0.0% to 1.4%), from 281 ratings
- Gloucester City takeaways: 6.9% (95% interval 3.3% to 13.7%), from 101 ratings
Choose an area or a business type
These figures describe groups. Use a current FSA record for an individual premises.
Gloucester City restaurantsGloucester City takeawaysFind a premises rating at the Food Standards Agency
Figures
- Gap against the same types−1.6 ppOther premises of the same business types and scheme in the same country; weighted to this area's mix. A difference has no Wilson interval. Comparison covers 1,031 ratings; excludes 0 ratings without an adequate same-type base.
- Median age of a rating362 daysDays since inspection, known rating dates only. This does not say an inspection is overdue. Based on 1,031 ratings with a known date.
- Older than two years14.1% (95% interval 12.0% to 16.4%), from 1,031 ratingsShare of dated results above two years. Missing dates stay outside this denominator.
- Waiting or unknown results32 recordsCount outside every known-rating share; waiting is not a rating of zero.
Shared scale: 0% to 3.2%.
Gloucester City: 1.5% (95% interval 0.8% to 2.4%), from 1,031 ratings
England: 3.1% (95% interval 3.0% to 3.2%), from 442,930 ratings
Gloucester City restaurants: 0.0% (95% interval 0.0% to 1.4%), from 281 ratings
Gloucester City takeaways: 6.9% (95% interval 3.3% to 13.7%), from 101 ratings
| Measure | Result | Low | High | Ratings counted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Known ratings | 1,031 ratings | No interval | No interval | Exact file count |
| Results needing improvement | 15 ratings | No interval | No interval | Exact file count |
| Waiting or unknown results | 32 records | No interval | No interval | Exact file count |
| Exempt premises | 12 premises | No interval | No interval | Exact file count |
| Needs improvement | 1.5% | 0.8% | 2.4% | 1,031 ratings |
| Rated five | 82.5% | 80.1% | 84.8% | 1,031 ratings |
Further calculated measures
| Measure | Result | Low | High | Ratings counted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gap against the same types | −1.6 pp | No interval | No interval | 1,031 ratings |
| Median age of a rating | 362 days | No interval | No interval | 1,031 ratings |
| Older than two years | 14.1% | 12.0% | 16.4% | 1,031 ratings |
| Low ratings with all three scores | 15 ratings | No interval | No interval | Exact file count |
| Measure | Result | Low | High | Ratings counted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Known ratings | 442,930 ratings | No interval | No interval | Exact file count |
| Results needing improvement | 13,862 ratings | No interval | No interval | Exact file count |
| Waiting or unknown results | 39,697 records | No interval | No interval | Exact file count |
| Exempt premises | 21,620 premises | No interval | No interval | Exact file count |
| Needs improvement | 3.1% | 3.0% | 3.2% | 442,930 ratings |
| Rated five | 78.5% | 78.3% | 78.6% | 442,930 ratings |
Further calculated measures
| Measure | Result | Low | High | Ratings counted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median age of a rating | 436 days | No interval | No interval | 442,930 ratings |
| Older than two years | 25.1% | 25.0% | 25.3% | 442,930 ratings |
| Low ratings with all three scores | 13,759 ratings | No interval | No interval | Exact file count |
| Hygiene | 22.6% | 21.8% | 23.3% | 13,759 ratings |
| Structural | 41.5% | 40.6% | 42.4% | 13,759 ratings |
| Confidence in management | 48.8% | 47.9% | 49.7% | 13,759 ratings |
What to do next
Part of what this page would normally show is missing from the accepted file: either the rating dates needed for an age figure, or the three component scores needed for a mix, or the second snapshot needed for a 30-day change. The figures that are present stand on their own denominators. The missing part is absent, not zero.
Open one business type in this area, or read how the figures are calculated.
Limits of these figures
Known results: 1,031 ratings; needing improvement: 15 ratings; waiting or unknown: 32 records; exempt: 12 premises. Waiting and exempt records are outside the known results.
Rating dates missing from 0 ratings. The median and age share use 1,031 ratings with known dates.
Low ratings with complete component scores: 15 ratings. Low ratings excluded because a score is missing: 0 ratings. Published ratings are not reconstructed from their components.
Component shares are withheld: fewer than 30 low ratings have all three scores. The complete-score count is shown; an absent share is not zero.
Unknown-result scenarios: 1.4% to 4.5% if every waiting or unknown result became known. These are scenario bounds, not confidence intervals. Exempt premises remain excluded.
Comparison covers 1,031 ratings; excludes 0 ratings without an adequate same-type base. The base uses other premises in England under the same scheme.
No 30-day change is published: two accepted files exactly 30 days apart are required. One snapshot cannot show how many premises improved or worsened.
Inspections are not a random sample. These intervals describe the known-result shares, not the chance that a particular premises is safe.
It does not tell you about one premises. A share describes the known ratings in an area on the day of the file, and a single rating can change the day after.
It does not count premises waiting for a rating, and it does not count exempt premises. Both stay outside the denominator, so a low share is not evidence that everything was inspected.
It does not say an inspection is overdue. The age of a rating is the gap since the last published inspection, and the publisher sets no deadline we could measure against.
It does not rank areas. Where two intervals overlap, the order of the two numbers carries no information.
It does not combine schemes. A Scottish pass result and a 0 to 5 score are different measurements and are never averaged.
Source
- Source
- Food Standards Agency, national English-language open data file
- File accepted
- 18 October 2026
- Publisher file timestamp
- 2026-10-17T01:06:42Z
- National file count
- 614,349
- Source SHA-256
- 0eccd1ba6db3e1cb9ec1e50c296a825d4c4a0dceec3935b2fc2e0106936b5715
- Calculation release
- fsa-2026-10-18-0eccd1ba6db3-e2b1a3747bdf
- Method
- Same-type, same-scheme profiles; unknown and exempt results excluded from shares.
- Substantive change
- 18 October 2026
Download this page’s aggregate CSV · Read this page’s calculation data · Read how the figures are calculated